On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 19:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:08:39 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > When the priority of a task, which is blocked on a lock, changes we must
> > propagate this change into the PI lock chain. Therefor the chain walk
> > code is changed to get rid of the references to current to avoid false
> > positives in the deadlock detector, as setscheduler might be called by a
> > task which holds the lock on which the task whose priority is changed is
> > blocked.
> > Also add some comments about the get/put_task_struct usage to avoid
> > confusion.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> >
> > include/linux/sched.h | 2 ++
> > kernel/rtmutex.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>
> That file's full of lockdep droppings from a different patchset. Please
> check the end result.
Will do in a minute
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
