On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Greg KH wrote:
> > In my upcoming patch set this test isn't needed at all, because suspending
> > a device automatically suspends all of its interfaces first. I've already
> > submitted the first few revised patches in that set (not the part that
> > removes the test, though), but you've probably been too busy to look at
> > them yet.
>
> I've glanced at them (and yes, been busy, they are still in my TO-APPLY
> queue, trying to sync up with Linus first), but I don't see anything in
> that set that changes the suspend logic.
>
> Or am I just missing something obvious? Which patch does that in your
> revised series?
It's not in any of the pieces you've gotten so far. It's about 3 patches
farther down the line.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
