Re: [patch 8/8] lock validator: add s390 to supported options

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:05:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >  config DEBUG_SPINLOCK_ALLOC
> > >  	bool "Spinlock debugging: detect incorrect freeing of live spinlocks"
> > > -	depends on DEBUG_SPINLOCK && X86
> > > +	depends on DEBUG_SPINLOCK && (X86 || S390)
> > 
> > Can we please stomp this out before it starts to look like
> > CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER?
> > 
> > We should define CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_LOCKDEP down in
> > arch/[i386|x86_64|s390]/Kconfig and use that in lib/Kconfig.debug.
> 
> How about this:
> 
> From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> 
> Add LOCKDEP_SUPPORT config option per architecture.

fine with me. Perhaps we can thus replace IRQ_TRACE_SUPPORT with 
LOCKDEP_SUPPORT as well, and would codify LOCKDEP_SUPPORT to mean 
irqflags-trace support and stacktrace support?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/