Re: [patch 55/61] lock validator: special locking: sb->s_umount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> > +++ linux/fs/dcache.c
> > @@ -470,8 +470,9 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
> >  		s_umount = &dentry->d_sb->s_umount;
> >  		if (down_read_trylock(s_umount)) {
> >  			if (dentry->d_sb->s_root != NULL) {
> > -				prune_one_dentry(dentry);
> > +// lockdep hack: do this better!
> >  				up_read(s_umount);
> > +				prune_one_dentry(dentry);
> >  				continue;
> 
> argh, you broke my kernel!
> 
> I'll whack some ifdefs in here so it's only known-broken if 
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
> 
> Again, we'd need the real fix here.

yeah. We should undo this patch for now. This will only be complained 
about if CONFIG_DEBUG_NON_NESTED_UNLOCKS is enabled. [i'll do this in my 
refactored queue]

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux