* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Each address family might have different locking rules, so we have
> > + * one slock key per address family:
> > + */
> > +static struct lockdep_type_key af_family_keys[AF_MAX];
> > +
> > +static void noinline sock_lock_init(struct sock *sk)
> > +{
> > + spin_lock_init_key(&sk->sk_lock.slock, af_family_keys + sk->sk_family);
> > + sk->sk_lock.owner = NULL;
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&sk->sk_lock.wq);
> > +}
>
> OK, no code outside net/core/sock.c uses sock_lock_init().
yeah.
> Hopefully the same is true of out-of-tree code...
it wont go unnoticed even if it does: we'll get a nonfatal lockdep
message and fix it up. I dont expect out-of-tree code to mess with
sk_lock.slock though ...
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
