Re: [patch] lock validator: rtmutex unlock order annotation

* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> > +	spin_unlock_non_nested(&task->pi_lock);
> > +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> 
> y'know, if an innocent civilian were to stumble across this code he or 
> she would wonder "wtf is that doing"?

most definitely! I'll clean that up (and the other items as well).

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] lock validator: rtmutex unlock order annotation
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] lock validator: rtmutex unlock order annotation
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 3/3] radix-tree: RCU lockless readside
• Next by Date: Re: [ck] Re: problem burning DVDs with 2.6.17-ck1 (mlockall?)
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] lock validator: rtmutex unlock order annotation
• Next by thread: [patch 0/3] rtmutex: Propagate priority setting into lock chains
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]