Re: [PATCH] avoid cpu removal if busy revisited

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:54:09 -0700
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:50:58 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > +static int test_cpu_busy(int cpu)
> > ...
> > +		if (moderate_cpu_removal && test_cpu_bust(cpu))
> 
> I love the function name but alas, the linker will not.
> 
Sorry, my refreshing process was bad.

> Let's treat this as an [rfc].  Please test the final version carefully.

Ah, yes. I should add  [RFC] to subject, reviews from cpu-hotplug people 
are welcome.

-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] avoid cpu removal if busy revisited
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] avoid cpu removal if busy revisited
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add MCP65 support for ahci driver
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add MCP65 support for sata_nv driver
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] avoid cpu removal if busy revisited
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] avoid cpu removal if busy revisited
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]