Re: how I know if a interrupt is ioapic_edge_type or ioapic_level_type? [Was Re: [Fwd: Re: [Linux-usb-users] Fwd: Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2 - USB issues]]

[Johny <kernel@agotnes.com>]

Chris,

If you keep me posted on the patch when released (I'm not on the kernel 
list, too high volume for me) I'll be happy to give your patch a whirl 
on my test box against whichever kernel you patch.

Your last point is real good, how DOES Windows figure it out? In saying 
that, without the VIA drivers I only have USB1.1 support on this 
motherboard... Again, happy to test some theories if you have some tests 
you'd like ran...

Cheers,

:)Johny

Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>
> > yap, in my opinion this function should back to
>
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq);
>
>
> this is *obviousyl* wrong, it should never have been merged like that
> and there are reports and complaints this causes problems for some
> people
>
> we should first attempt to get all the IDs (some are clearly missing
> still, patch coming up to address that) and where that fails perhaps
> have a kernel command-line parameter to be overly aggressive as a
> stop-gap until we van figure out the proper solution
>
> i'd also like to figure out why the quirk is needed/fails when people
> are using ACPI for interrupt routing as presumbly that must work as
> windows relies on it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/