On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 16:29 +1000, Peter Williams wrote: > Peter > PS A year or so ago the CKRM folks promised to have a look at using PAGG > instead of inventing their own but I doubt that they ever did. I think it was about 2 years back. We weren't going to re-invent after that point, we had a full implementation at that time. If i remember correct, we concluded that some design constraints and additional overhead were the reasons for not proceeding in that direction. BTW, if i remember correct, PAGG folks also promised to look at CKRM to see if they could use CKRM instead. chandra -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - [email protected] | .......you may get it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- References:
- [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] genirq: allow usage of no_irq_chip
- Next by Date: Re: [ALSA PATCH] HG repo - 1.0.12rc1
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 00/11] Task watchers: Introduction
- Index(es):