Re: [PATCH 4/4] Slab Reclaim logic

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Pekka J Enberg wrote:

> Not everyone is IA-64.  The slab allocator is already pretty memory 
> hungry so lets try not to make it any worse, ok?

We have a huge memory problem with reclain. This is only a small 
sacrifice. Moreover even on 32 bit platforms this will not be significant 
for most caches that are cache aligned.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC 0/4] Object reclaim via the slab allocator V1
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 4/4] Slab Reclaim logic
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 4/4] Slab Reclaim logic
    • From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 4/4] Slab Reclaim logic
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 4/4] Slab Reclaim logic
    • From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Slab Reclaim logic
• Next by Date: What's in git.git and announcing v1.4.1-rc1
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Slab Reclaim logic
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Slab Reclaim logic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]