Re: [PATCH -mm 6/6] cpu_relax(): ptrace.c coding style fix

Andreas Mohr wrote:
> 
> Fix existing cpu_relax() loop to have proper kernel style.
> 

...

> @@ -182,9 +182,8 @@
>  	if (!write_trylock(&tasklist_lock)) {
>  		local_irq_enable();
>  		task_unlock(task);
> -		do {
> +		while (!write_can_lock(&tasklist_lock))
>  			cpu_relax();
> -		} while (!write_can_lock(&tasklist_lock));

This is a change in behavior, not just style.  (And there is nothing
wrong with the current style.)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH -mm 6/6] cpu_relax(): ptrace.c coding style fix
    • From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH -mm 6/6] cpu_relax(): ptrace.c coding style fix
    • From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] ACPI: reduce code size, clean up, fix validator message
• Next by Date: [PATCH] riport LADAR driver
• Previous by thread: [PATCH -mm 6/6] cpu_relax(): ptrace.c coding style fix
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm 6/6] cpu_relax(): ptrace.c coding style fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]