RE: 2.6.17-mm1 - possible recursive locking detected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 
>> The key thing here is that our recent changes in
>> how the locks are _used_ is okay -- and I think it is.
>
>Well.  We don't know that.  We just know that this report of unokayness
>wasn't right.  With Ingo's Linux-only patch we're in a 
>position to verify
>that the locking is probably OK.

If this were really recursive, my machine would have deadlocked
instead of booting normally like it did, no?

-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux