Loop may be correctly waiting for the owner/pending bit to be set, just
checking, I don't remember all the bit values.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-acpi-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Moore, Robert
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 2:09 PM
> To: Andreas Mohr; Andrew Morton
> Cc: Brown, Len; [email protected];
[email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH -mm 5/6] cpu_relax(): use in ACPI lock
>
> I may be interpreting this incorrectly, but are you busy-waiting on
the
> ACPI Global Lock to become free?
>
> Bob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-acpi-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Mohr
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 2:01 PM
> > To: Andrew Morton
> > Cc: Brown, Len; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> > Subject: [PATCH -mm 5/6] cpu_relax(): use in ACPI lock
> >
> >
> > Use cpu_relax() in __acpi_acquire_global_lock() etc.
> >
> >
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
