RE: [PATCH] Unify CONFIG_LBD and CONFIG_LSF handling

["Matt LaPlante" <laplam@rpi.edu>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:arjan@infradead.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:59 AM
> To: Roman Zippel
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox; Linus Torvalds; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> webmaster@cyberdogtech.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unify CONFIG_LBD and CONFIG_LSF handling
> 
> 
> > > Or is that too verbose?
> >
> > How likely is it that someone who doesn't understand the question needs
> > this option? I think N is a safe answer here.
> 
> N is not the safe answer; Y is. If you set it to N you can't read all
> your files (if there is a big one) etc etc.
> The safe-but-a-bit-slower answer really is Y.
> 

So should default be changed to Y?  It's currently N for kconfig, despite
the recommendation to the contrary.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/