Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:11:13 -0700
>> Jay Lan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Another observation that i considered bad news is that all
>>> 10 runs produced 1 to 5 recv() error with errno=105 (ENOBUF).
>>>
>>
>> Well that's rather bad. AFAICT most of the allocations in there are
>> GFP_KERNEL, so why is this happening?
>>
>>
>
> Need to trace the cause.
>
>> Because the kernel is producing netlink messages faster than
>> userspace can
>> consume them, perhaps?
> Hmm...possible. A quick check would be to reduce the frequency of
> exits and see.
>
>> If so, the sender needs to block, which means we
>> need to make reception of these stats a privileged operation?
>>
>>
> Won't it suffice to make delivery of these stats best effort, with
> userspace dealing with missing data,
How do you recover the missed data?
> rather than risk delaying exits ? The cases where exits are so
> frequent as in this program should be
This is very true. However, it was a 2p IA64 machine. I am too frightened to
speak "512p"...
Regards,
- jay
> very few. Making the reception privileged would kind of constrain the
> utilization of stats and I'm not
> sure if its warranted.
>
>
> --Shailabh
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
