Re: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture

[Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@de.ibm.com>]

On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 09:15 -0400, Mike Grundy wrote:
> +int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* Make sure the probe isn't going on a difficult instruction */
> +	if (is_prohibited_opcode((kprobe_opcode_t *) p->addr))
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Use the get_insn_slot() facility for correctness */
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
> +		if (!p->ainsn.insn) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		} else {
> +			/* this should only happen if you got the slot */
> +			memcpy(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr,
> +			       MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
> +			p->ainsn.inst_type =
> +			    get_instruction_type(p->ainsn.insn);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	p->opcode = *p->addr;
> +	return ret;

I think we should also check for correct instruction alignment in this
function (2 bytes on s390), like:

if ((unsigned long)p->addr & 0x01) {
	printk("Attempt to register kprobe at an unaligned address\n");
	return -EINVAL;
}

Jan


---
Jan Glauber
IBM Linux Technology Center
Linux on zSeries Development, Boeblingen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/