On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 13:54 +0100, Felix Oxley wrote: > On 19 Jun 2006, at 23:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > FACTOR=20 batches the timer wheel timers to 40ms on a HZ=250 kernel > > Should that read 80ms? Doh, I lost my abacus and it's hard to find a good replacement :) tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- From: mark gross <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- From: Felix Oxley <[email protected]>
- [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- Prev by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 09/11] Task watchers: Add support for per-task watchers
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] autofs4 needs to force fail return revalidate
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
- Index(es):
 |