Re: [PATCH 2/3] FS_ENET: use PAL for mii management

[Gerhard Jaeger <g.jaeger@sysgo.com>]

Hi,

On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:58, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> 
> This patch should update the fs_enet infrastructure to utilize
> Phy Abstraction Layer subsystem. Inside there are generic driver rehaul,
> board-specific portion to respect driver changes (for 8272ads and 866ads).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/ppc/platforms/mpc8272ads_setup.c |  154 ++++++----
>  arch/ppc/platforms/mpc866ads_setup.c  |  192 ++++++------
>  arch/ppc/platforms/mpc885ads_setup.c  |  179 ++++--------
>  arch/ppc/syslib/mpc8xx_devices.c      |    8 +
>  arch/ppc/syslib/mpc8xx_sys.c          |    6 
>  arch/ppc/syslib/pq2_devices.c         |    5 
>  arch/ppc/syslib/pq2_sys.c             |    3 
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/Makefile          |    6 
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/fec.h             |   42 +++
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c    |  207 ++++++++-----
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-mii.c     |  507 ---------------------------------
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet.h         |   40 ++-
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c         |   10 -
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-fec.c         |  132 +--------
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-scc.c         |    4 
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c     |  384 +++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fec.c         |  243 ++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fixed.c       |   92 ------
>  include/asm-ppc/mpc8260.h             |    1 
>  include/asm-ppc/mpc8xx.h              |    1 
>  include/linux/fs_enet_pd.h            |   50 +--
>  21 files changed, 983 insertions(+), 1283 deletions(-)

[SNIPSNAP]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c b/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c
> index 24a5e2e..145bf4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mii.h>
>  #include <linux/ethtool.h>
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/irq.h>
> @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@
>  
>  #include "fs_enet.h"
>  
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_8xx
>  static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **dirp, u8 **datp, u8 *mskp, int port, int bit)
>  {
> @@ -106,64 +108,25 @@ static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **dirp, u
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_8260
> -static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **dirp, u8 **datp, u8 *mskp, int port, int bit)
> +static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **datp, u8 *mskp,
> +		struct fs_mii_bit *mii_bit)

is it possible, that in case of CONFIG_8xx you'll have two times this 
bitbang_prep_bit() function? 

Gerhard

-- 
Gerhard Jaeger <gjaeger@sysgo.com>            
SYSGO AG                      Embedded and Real-Time Software
www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.pikeos.com | www.osek.de 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/