Re: [patch] sharing maximum errno symbol used in __syscall_return (i386)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Hi,

__syscall_return in unistd.h is maintained?

In the macro the value returned from system call is
compared with the maximum error number defined in a header file to know the call is successful or not. However, the maximum error number is hard-coded and is not updated.

And it's wrong, anyway. It has long been agreed that the maximum errno value, for any architecture, is 4095.

So we should do just:


   #define GENERIC_ERRNO_MAX 4095

Here my patch is proved to be useful for maintaining __syscall_return:-P

Well, most of the various macros in unistd.h really should go too, since they're mostly underutilized and definitely ill-maintained.

The only one that I know of which is still used by the kernel itself is execve. If so, perhaps we should just have an open-coded execve.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux