Zachary Amsden wrote:
I was thinking more of having mach-xen/built-in.o, mach-default/built-in.o, mach-es7000/built-in.o, mach-voyager/built-in.o all be linked specially so they can be compiled into the same kernel either as one giant batch
Yeah, that would be nice. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
- Prev by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 09/11] Task watchers: Add support for per-task watchers
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
- Next by thread: [PATCH] Fix bounds check in vsnprintf, to allow for a 0 size and NULL buffer
- Index(es):
 |