On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:14:55 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > Why do we want a separate source file for this one function?
> >
> Because if it shared a file with something else, someone would complain
> about it bloating code which doesn't use it... At the moment there are
> no in-tree users (though I'm sure there's something out there with an
> open-coded version of this), but we'll be needing it for Xen.
Doesn't this already add the bloat/code? ::
diff -r c175fd50e604 lib/Makefile
--- a/lib/Makefile Tue Jun 20 16:47:53 2006 -0700
+++ b/lib/Makefile Tue Jun 20 16:53:19 2006 -0700
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ lib-y := errno.o ctype.o string.o vsprin
lib-y := errno.o ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
bust_spinlocks.o rbtree.o radix-tree.o dump_stack.o \
idr.o div64.o int_sqrt.o bitmap.o extable.o prio_tree.o \
- sha1.o
+ sha1.o kasprintf.o
> I'm happy to fold it into vsprintf.c though.
That makes sense to me.
Thanks,
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
