Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless

On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> So given those complexities, and the lack of a _user_ of
> radix-tree-rcu-lockless-readside.patch, it doesn't look like 2.6.18 stuff
> at this time.

So what should I do ? leave the bug in ppc64 or kill it's scalability
when taking interrupts ? You have one user already, me. From what Nick
says, the patch has been beaten up pretty heavily and seems stable....

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities
Next by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 09/11] Task watchers: Add support for per-task watchers
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]