RE: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Do you want the patch to be submitted to netdev(the mailing list that we
usually submit to) ?

Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 5:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; Jes Sorensen
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries
list (2nd version)


"Ravinandan Arakali" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is a known problem and has been fixed in our internal source tree. We
> will be submitting the patch soon.

Please send me a copy asap - I urgently need to get the -mm patches vaguely
stabilised.

I'm somewhat surprised that the sn2 failed so seriously - I thought Jes was
testing that fairly regularly.

I think we kinda-sorta have a handle on the s2io->IRQ problem (although the
unexpectedly-held console spinlock is a mystery).

The scsi->BIO->mempool->slab crash is also a mystery.

Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux