On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:40:49 -0600 Jim Cromie wrote:
> Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:57:21 -0600 Jim Cromie wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 12:42:28 -0600
> >>> Jim Cromie <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Fixup patches agains next -mm would be suitable. Please keep them
> >>> super-short: basically one-patch-per-review-comment. That way I can easily
> >>> instertion-sort the patches into place and we retain a nice patch series.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> OK. Just so Im clear, Ill patch against the tail of the set (ie -mm1),
> >> and you'll push them forward into the
> >>
> >
> > WTH? "you'll" ??
> >
> >
>
> are we talking apostrophes here, or division of labor ?
> If the latter, what have I missed ?
> Andrew specifically said 'patch against next -mm', I intended to follow
> his instructions.
apostrophes :)
and ISTM that you didn't follow his request.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]