On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 06:26:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 17:43, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> > > This is a first version of support for the Cell BE "Reliability,
> > > Availability and Serviceability" features.
> >
> > Does it really make sense to do this under a config option? I don't see
> > why anyone would not want to know that their machine is about to melt.
> >
> You can only have that when running on bare metal. Machines that run
> on a hypervisor can't run that code.
Well, it's harmless to build it in even on hypervisor systems, right?
> It probably makes sense to auto-select that option for CONFIG_CELL_BLADE
> though.
Sounds like a reasonable trade-off.
-Olof
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
