Re: [PATCH] Clear abnormal poweroff flag on VIA southbridges, fix resume

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:01:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Is CONFIG_ACPI the right thing to use here?  As opposed to, say, CONFIG_PM?
> Or CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP??

I've implemented it using the acpi register handling code, so 
CONFIG_ACPI_something makes sense. I believe that the APM bios will 
handle it itself, but the machine I have doesn't support APM so can't 
check that. CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP might be a better choice than CONFIG_ACPI, 
yes.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Clear abnormal poweroff flag on VIA southbridges, fix resume
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Clear abnormal poweroff flag on VIA southbridges, fix resume
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Clear abnormal poweroff flag on VIA southbridges, fix resume
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] fix spinlock-debug looping
• Next by Date: Re: batched write
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Clear abnormal poweroff flag on VIA southbridges, fix resume
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Clear abnormal poweroff flag on VIA southbridges, fix resume
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]