Re: [PATCH] utrace: new modular infrastructure for user debug/tracing

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:50:11AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I have been working on for a while, and imagining for much longer,
> replacing ptrace from the ground up.  This is what I've come up with so
> far, and I'm looking for some reactions on the direction.  What I'm

Roland,

Is this what has elsewhere been referred to as 'ptrace-ng'?

Thanks.

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Open source, database driven DNS Software 
http://netherlabs.nl              Open and Closed source services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] utrace: new modular infrastructure for user debug/tracing
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] utrace: new modular infrastructure for user debug/tracing
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] utrace: new modular infrastructure for user debug/tracing
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC/SERIOUS] grilling troubled CPUs for fun and profit?
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] increase spinlock-debug looping timeouts (write_lock and NMI)
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] utrace: new modular infrastructure for user debug/tracing
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] utrace: new modular infrastructure for user debug/tracing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]