Re: [patch 8/8] lock validator: add s390 to supported options

On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 15:05 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  config DEBUG_SPINLOCK_ALLOC
> >  	bool "Spinlock debugging: detect incorrect freeing of live spinlocks"
> > -	depends on DEBUG_SPINLOCK && X86
> > +	depends on DEBUG_SPINLOCK && (X86 || S390)
> 
> Can we please stomp this out before it starts to look like
> CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER?

why is this even an arch option ?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 8/8] lock validator: add s390 to supported options
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 8/8] lock validator: add s390 to supported options
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 8/8] lock validator: add s390 to supported options
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] increase spinlock-debug looping timeouts (write_lock and NMI)
• Next by Date: Re: Serial Console and Slow SCSI Disk Access?
• Previous by thread: RE: Wish for 2006 to Alan Cox and Jeff Garzik: A functional Driverfor PDC202XX
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 8/8] lock validator: add s390 to supported options
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]