Peter Williams wrote:
Balbir Singh wrote:Peter Williams wrote:If we can achieve something similar with low overhead in user space, I wouldcertainly love to see it.The Windows and Solaris components of IBM's eWLM product provide much the same functionality as CKRM from user space. Don't they?Peter
I know absolutely nothing about eWLM's Windows and Solaris product. -- Balbir Singh, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- References:
- [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- Prev by Date: Re: UDF filesystem has some bugs on truncating
- Next by Date: [-mm patch] binfmt_elf: fix checks for bad address
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
- Index(es):
 |