On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:15:33 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 14:11 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > > My personal preference is to keep that line, as it makes it easier to
> > > read. But as always: de gustibus non est disputandum :)
> >
> > Feel free to send patches for scripts/kernel-doc instead. :)
>
> Yeah, Russell King pointed me to the nano-howto 2 minutes ago. Not
> reading docs is always backfiring at some point. :(
>
> Seriously, is it hard to fix ? I'm not good with perl, so its likely
> that I would make more mess than fixups.
I don't know for sure. I have looked at it a bit and
it's messy code IMHO. Might be easier/better just to rewrite
the function (comment) header parsing.
Andrew also wants the short function description to be able to be
more than one line. That could/should be incorporated at the same time.
OTOH, it's a defined doc. language and these files contain errors...
---
~Randy
PS: finally fixed Ingo's email address.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
