Andi Kleen wrote:
Incoming packets are only time stamped when someone asks for the timestamps.
Doesn't that add scheduling latency to the timestamps? Or is is a flag that gets set to trigger timestamping at packet arrival?
Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- References:
- Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- From: Harry Edmon <[email protected]>
- Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- From: Harry Edmon <[email protected]>
- Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]>
- Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- Prev by Date: Re: batched write
- Next by Date: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] kdump: add a missing notifier before crashing
- Previous by thread: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- Next by thread: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- Index(es):
 |