Re: [ckpatch][15/29] hz-no_default_250.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
>Yes I stored a family of these values and 864 was ~ the optimum for a high 
>value for desktops and ~84 for a low value but were unpopular for not being 

82 IIRC.

>something decimally familiar. Also lots of code kind of broke with values 
>below 100 in the kernel.

Ought to be fixed. Just like the code which assumed 100 Hz and broke during 
the initial switch to 1000, before we went back again to 250. :p


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux