Re: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU, kernel 2.6.16.20 & 2.6.16-1.2122_FC5[smp]

In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:05:00 -0700, Konstantin Antselovich wrote:

> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201 BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#2, swapper/0
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201  lock: c266f600, .magic: dead4ead, .owner:
> swapper/0, .owner_cpu: 2
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201  [<c01cc02d>]
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0xd2
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201  [<c02e5bf7>]
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201 _spin_lock_irqsave+0x9/0xd
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201  [<f88b7768>]
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201 ahd_freeze_simq+0x12/0x43 [aic79xx]

Please try 2.6.17.  The spinlock was removed.

-- 
Chuck
 "You can't read a newspaper if you can't read."  --George W. Bush
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 8 ( WAS: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU, kernel 2.6.16.20 & 2.6.16-1.2122_FC5[smp])
    • From: Konstantin Antselovich <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Newbie questions on the kernel programming
• Next by Date: Re: Kernel panic when re-inserting Adaptec PCMCIA card
• Previous by thread: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU, kernel 2.6.16.20 & 2.6.16-1.2122_FC5[smp]
• Next by thread: Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 8 ( WAS: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU, kernel 2.6.16.20 & 2.6.16-1.2122_FC5[smp])
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]