Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ

On Monday 19 June 2006 15:21, Con Kolivas wrote:

> struct clock_event, the whole struct looks like a suitable candidate for
> __read_only.

duh

__read_mostly I mean

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
• Next by Date: [RFC:VFS] autofs4 needs to force fail return revalidate
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCHSET] Announce: High-res timers, tickless/dyntick and dynamic HZ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]