Re: [Openipmi-developer] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1, ipmi_si

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry, I've been on vacation for a week without internet, so I'm just
getting caught up.

The IPMI driver spawns a low-priority thread that will poll the driver
when it finds there is something to do.  It's possible that the hardware
is not setting things properly and is always telling the driver it has
to do something.  It's possible that the new version of the firmware
enabled interrupts; I think there's a problem with the driver here; it
should not really enable the kernel thread if interrupts are working. 
The driver should also probably call schedule() instead of udelay() in
the kernel thread when a short timeout is requested by the state machine.

In either situation, the kernel thread will sit there and spin, and if
nothing else is scheduled for 10 seconds on that CPU you will get that
warning.  Can you check a few things for me?

cat /proc/ipmi/0/si_stats and send me the output.

If you do "top", is the kipmi0 always running?

Is your IPMI interface KCS or SMIC?  The IPMI driver should report this
in the system log at startup.

Thanks,

-Corey

Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2.6.17-rc6 I get these soft lockup warnings quite regularly on one of
> my DL145-G2 systems (dual dual-core (opteron 275), x86_64).
>
> Here's an example of one:
>
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.246571] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.247456] 
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.247457] Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff802a6eba>{softlockup_tick+250}
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.247496]        <ffffffff80293bb7>{update_process_times+87} <ffffffff80279923>{smp_local_timer_interrupt+35}
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.247546]        <ffffffff80279e61>{smp_apic_timer_interrupt+65} <ffffffff8026712e>{apic_timer_interrupt+98} <EOI>
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.247599]        <ffffffff802526c3>{try_to_del_timer_sync+83} <ffffffff8026be38>{_spin_unlock_irqrestore+8}
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.247652]        <ffffffff880eab78>{:ipmi_si:ipmi_thread+72} <ffffffff880eab30>{:ipmi_si:ipmi_thread+0}
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.247707]        <ffffffff80237099>{kthread+217} <ffffffff8026743a>{child_rip+8}
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.247757]        <ffffffff8029d280>{keventd_create_kthread+0} <ffffffff80236fc0>{kthread+0}
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.247807]        <ffffffff80267432>{child_rip+0}
>
> I have several more, all of which include ipmi_si in one way or
> another.  Usually these lockups happened on CPUs 2 and 3, tho today I
> got one of CPU 1.
>
> It's interesting to note that these logs are happening every 30 minutes
> (munin queries 'openipmi -I open sensors' about once every 5 minutes).
>
> Jun 12 18:45:40 laura kernel: [ 2876.040688] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#2!
> Jun 12 19:15:54 laura kernel: [ 4688.141966] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#2!
> Jun 12 19:46:06 laura kernel: [ 6499.159958] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#3!
> Jun 12 20:16:17 laura kernel: [ 8309.394462] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#2!
> Jun 12 20:46:29 laura kernel: [10120.468415] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#3!
> Jun 12 21:16:42 laura kernel: [11931.614321] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#2!
> Jun 12 21:46:54 laura kernel: [13742.672285] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#2!
> [rebooted in between]
> Jun 14 00:57:55 laura kernel: [97133.246571] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
> Jun 14 01:28:07 laura kernel: [98944.316467] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#3!
>
> Not having the ipmi_si module loaded means these warnings don't happen.
>
> I suspect this started happening when I upgraded the firmware of the
> iLo 100i BMC from 1.00 to version 1.23 (the other system's firmware
> wasn't upgraded yet).  I'm still reporting it here on the chance that it
> actually is a kernel/ipmi_si module bug.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>   

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux