Re: emergency or init=/bin/sh mode and terminal signals

Samuel Thibault writes:

The attached patch sets such session and controlling tty up, which fixes
the issue. The unfortunate effect is that init might be killed if one
presses control-C very fast after its start.


Doesn't the kernel protect process 1 from any signal
that it does not have a handler for?

I think there is no problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: emergency or init=/bin/sh mode and terminal signals
  - From: Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
Previous by thread: Re: emergency or init=/bin/sh mode and terminal signals
Next by thread: Re: emergency or init=/bin/sh mode and terminal signals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]