Re: [PATCH] Implement AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW flag for linkat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> Where does POSIX require that?  IIRC, it was along the lines of "application
> can't rely on kernel doing the right thing", not "kernel must do the
> wrong thing"...

Well, the patch as sent in does seem sane, as long as glibc doesn't start 
defaulting to the insane behaviour. Giving users the _ability_ to link to 
the symlink target is certainly not wrong, regardless of any standard. 
Doing it by default is another matter.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux