Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.

On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:20:34 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> > Should we send signal (kill or stop) to tasks whose cpus_allowed only contains
> > removed cpu rather than simple migration ?
> 
> At least as a sysctl option it probably makes sense yes.
> 

Thank you for your advise !
I'll retry.

-Kame


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
• Next by Date: Lots of new section mismatches
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]