Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> This is a bit pessimistic. But forecd migration of RT task which is bounded
> to the special cpu will cause unpredictable trouble, I think.

More trouble than running it on a CPU that is about to fail?
Doubtful.

It seems like a case of "never check for an error you don't know
how to handle"

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [patch 0/6] [Network namespace] introduction
• Next by Date: Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
• Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot remove of cpus which have special RT tasks.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]