On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 12:38:04AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Which operation is the one which stops the interference, the enable or > > the disable? > > Disable alone was not enough to stop interference. I'm going to drop this patch for now, in the hopes that with Daniel's ZyDas contacts you can devise a more palatable solution. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville [email protected] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- References:
- [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- From: Jiri Benc <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] check_process_timers: fix possible lockup
- Next by Date: Re: SATA: Marvell 88SE6141 support?
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem
- Index(es):
 |