On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 06:37:37PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Iau, 2006-06-15 am 18:59 +0200, ysgrifennodd Pierre Ossman:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > > The data field is ulong, pointers fit in ulongs. Casting them to int is
> > > bad for 64bit systems.
> >
> > It's in my (rather large) queue. I'm just waiting for a merge window. :)
>
> I'd have thought that one was a "Duh whoops, fix it now" kind of
> submission for 2.6.17
akpm sent it to me, so I merged it into my tree, and now I've been
sitting on it all this week because I've taken the decision that I
do not want to put anything further into Linus' tree until we actually
see 2.6.17.
If you look at what Linus said when he released -rc7, the reason we
had -rc7 instead of -final was that we had too many changes. We can
either go on throwing more and more changes, albiet 100% correct
bug fix changes, and carry on releasing -rc after -rc, but at some
point there must be an end to this, and -final must happen.
It's been three months since 2.6.16 was released. I'm not prepared
to be the reason that we have another week of -rc-ism because of too
many small but apparantly correct changes.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
