Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Zoltan Menyhart wrote:

> My conclusion: let's stick to atomic counters.

Good to know. But we would run into trouble if the atomic counters would 
be contended.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
    • From: Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]>

• References:
  • light weight counters: race free through local_t?
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
    • From: Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]>
  • Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
    • From: Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ON/OFF control of taskstats accounting data at do_exit
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs: sys_poll with timeout -1 bug fix
• Previous by thread: Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
• Next by thread: Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]