On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Zoltan Menyhart wrote: > My conclusion: let's stick to atomic counters. Good to know. But we would run into trouble if the atomic counters would be contended. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
- From: Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]>
- Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
- References:
- light weight counters: race free through local_t?
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
- From: Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]>
- Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
- From: Zoltan Menyhart <[email protected]>
- light weight counters: race free through local_t?
- Prev by Date: Re: ON/OFF control of taskstats accounting data at do_exit
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs: sys_poll with timeout -1 bug fix
- Previous by thread: Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
- Next by thread: Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
- Index(es):
 |