Re: resubmitting intr urb in 2.4 and 2.6 kernels

On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:08:32PM +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Could anybody explain the reason why intr urb auto resubmitting was removed
> from 2.6 kernels?
> 
> Or just tell me, it was removed because of some technical problems in it
> or only for better architecure?
> 
> If it was architecure cleanup, why autoresubmitting was implemented in 2.4?

Consistancy, now all urbs work the same way, and you don't have to
remember special things depending on the type of the endpoint.  Search
the archives of the linux-usb-devel mailing list early in the 2.5
development series for the details if you are curious.


thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • re: [PATCH] PCI: add proper MCFG table parsing to ACPI core.
    • From: Konrad Rzeszutek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • resubmitting intr urb in 2.4 and 2.6 kernels
    • From: Sergej Pupykin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: cdrom support with thinkpad x6 ultrabay
• Next by Date: Re: cdrom support with thinkpad x6 ultrabay
• Previous by thread: resubmitting intr urb in 2.4 and 2.6 kernels
• Next by thread: re: [PATCH] PCI: add proper MCFG table parsing to ACPI core.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]