Re: [PATCH -mm] i386 syscall opcode reordering (pipelining)

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:09:59PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Andreas Mohr wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I'd guess that this version features improved pipeline parallelism,
> >since we isolate competing %ebx accesses (_syscall4()) and
> >stack push operations (_syscall5()), right?
> 
> is anybody actually EVER using those???
> I would think not....

In that case... consider the patch dumped ;)

Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH -mm] i386 syscall opcode reordering (pipelining)
    • From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -mm] i386 syscall opcode reordering (pipelining)
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: process starvation with 2.6 scheduler
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] NI5010 netcard cleanup (was: Re: NI5010 network driver -- MAINTAINERS entry)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] i386 syscall opcode reordering (pipelining)
• Next by thread: [PATCH -mm] i386 usercopy.c opcode reordering (pipelining)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]