Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585

here is the output of SysRq-T and SysRq-M:

http://www.dworf.com/sysrq.txt

any ideas?

thanks


Mike Galbraith wrote:

Does top freeze if started from an mlockall(MCL_PRESENT|MCL_FUTURE)
shell running at realtime priority?

Try SysRq-T and SysRq-M during freezes to gather info about VM and task
state during freeze.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
  - From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

References:
- bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
  - From: David Osojnik <[email protected]>
- Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
  - From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 7/8] lock validator: s390 use raw_spinlock in mcck handler
Next by Date: Re: [uml-devel] [UML] Problems building and running 2.6.17-rc4 on x86-64
Previous by thread: Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
Next by thread: Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]