Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 04/11] Task watchers: Make process events configurable as a module

[Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>]

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 19:54 -0500, Chase Venters wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2006 18:54, Matt Helsley wrote:
> 
> > +static void cn_proc_fini(void)
> > +{
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	err = unregister_task_watcher(&cn_proc_nb);
> > +	if (err != 0)
> > +		printk(KERN_WARNING
> > +		       "cn_proc failed to unregister its task notify block\n");
> 
> How about if (err), or if (unregister_task_watcher(&cn_proc_nb))?

I don't see any worthwhile benefit to the former and I've seen feedback
that the latter is less readable.

> > +	cn_del_callback(&cn_proc_event_id);
> > +}
> > +
> >  module_init(cn_proc_init);
> > +module_exit(cn_proc_fini);
> 
> Thanks,
> Chase


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/