Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API

Chase,

On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Chase Venters wrote:
> I'm trying to imagine what kind of legitimate non-GPL modules might 
> use them.

Example: in-kernel RTP implementation derived from AT&T rtp-lib
implementation (non-GPL compatible license) utilizing this kernel
interface for UDP socket access.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
  - From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
  - From: Sridhar Samudrala <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
  - From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
  - From: Ben Greear <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
  - From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: statistics infrastructure (in -mm tree) review
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Task watchers: Task Watchers
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]