On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:00:59PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Such a change would would indeed break XFS, in exactly the way you
Oh, I should clarify - the suggestion of using sb->s_blocksize/
s_blocksize_bits was what I meant by "would break XFS".
> > suggest Jan - the realtime subvolume does typically use a different
> > blocksize from the data subvolume (the realtime extent size is used,
> > and this can be set per-inode too), and there would now be no way to
> > distinguish this preferred IO size difference.
>
> It can be made into an inode operation:
*nod* - that'd work fine for our needs here.
cheers.
--
Nathan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
