Jens Could you let me know what tests would be fair to make comparsion between the I/O schedulers? Thanks. - Vishal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- References:
- CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- From: "Vishal Patil" <[email protected]>
- CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- From: "Vishal Patil" <[email protected]>
- Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- From: "Vishal Patil" <[email protected]>
- Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line
- Next by Date: PATA: UDMA settings in Alans patch-2.6.17-rc4-ide1.gz better than with 2.6.17-rc6-mm2
- Previous by thread: Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- Next by thread: Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
- Index(es):
 |