On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 11:12 +0100, Felix Oxley wrote:
> (Regarding Hard Real Time, my understanding is that that depends on a
> _guarantee_ that the system will always be able to produce the
> 'result' within the required interval. Ingo's -rt patches may give
> exceedingly good responsiveness but they offer no guarantees, so they
> cannot be considered Hard Real Time)
The -rt kernel is capable of hard realtime, modulo any bugs, but no one
has yet done an analysis of the few non-preemptible code paths to
determine what guarantees it can make.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]